Activity ID
14320Expires
April 3, 2028Format Type
Journal-basedCME Credit
1Fee
30CME Provider: JAMA Oncology
Description of CME Course
Importance Despite recent declines in breast cancer mortality rates, substantial disparities persist among race and ethnicity groups. Genomic assays are crucial for understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, providing valuable insights into prognosis and treatment response. Their integration into personalized clinical decision-making has notably enhanced outcomes, making these assays particularly valuable for underrepresented populations, which often face disproportionately poorer prognoses. Expanding research to evaluate the performance and predictive value of these assays across diverse groups is essential to ensure equitable benefits for all patients.
Observations This review evaluated the distribution of risk estimates from multigene assays, primarily focusing on 21-, 70-, and 50-gene signature assays, their predictive capabilities and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival outcomes across race and ethnicity groups. Findings indicate that racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes were influenced by a complex interplay of biological, social, and systemic factors. Black women were more likely to have aggressive tumor phenotypes, such as luminal B and basal-like subtypes, which contributed to poorer outcomes. These disparities persist even after adjusting for genomic assay results and molecular subtypes, suggesting that genomic factors alone cannot fully explain differences in clinical outcomes. Although subgroup analyses from 2 randomized clinical trials showed no apparent differences in the 21-gene signature’s predictive value across racial groups, further research is needed to ensure that genomic assays are equitably calibrated for diverse populations.
Conclusions and Relevance This review supports genomic assays as valuable tools for informing prognosis and treatment decisions in breast cancer; however, they do not fully capture factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes. A comprehensive approach that integrates genomic data with a deeper understanding of social determinants and systemic inequities is essential to ensure all patients benefit equitably from advancements in personalized medicine.
Disclaimers
1. This activity is accredited by the American Medical Association.
2. This activity is free to AMA members.
ABMS Member Board Approvals by Type
ABMS Lifelong Learning CME Activity
Allergy and Immunology
Anesthesiology
Colon and Rectal Surgery
Family Medicine
Medical Genetics and Genomics
Nuclear Medicine
Ophthalmology
Pathology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery
Preventive Medicine
Psychiatry and Neurology
Radiology
Thoracic Surgery
Urology
Commercial Support?
NoNOTE: If a Member Board has not deemed this activity for MOC approval as an accredited CME activity, this activity may count toward an ABMS Member Board’s general CME requirement. Please refer directly to your Member Board’s MOC Part II Lifelong Learning and Self-Assessment Program Requirements.
Educational Objectives
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Oncology, Women's Health, Cancer Genetics, Genetics and Genomics
Competencies
Medical Knowledge
CME Credit Type
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0178