Activity ID
15137Expires
September 17, 2029Format Type
Journal-basedCME Credit
1Fee
$30CME Provider: JAMA Network Open
Description of CME Course
Importance Most diabetes care is managed in primary care settings, which represent a critical yet underutilized site for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) adoption. Whether CGM initiation by primary care clinicians improves glycemic outcomes and reduces acute health care utilization remains understudied.
Objective To evaluate the association of primary care–initiated CGM with changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among adults with insulin-treated diabetes.
Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was performed at 18 primary care clinics within Montefiore Medical Center, a large safety-net health system in the Bronx, New York. Adults 18 years or older with any insulin-treated diabetes who had at least 1 primary care visit between August 1, 2022, and August 1, 2025, were included. Patients were excluded if they were uninsured, if they had a CGM prescription in the prior 2 years, or if their first CGM during follow-up was prescribed outside primary care.
Exposure First CGM prescription by a primary care clinician.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were HbA1c level trajectories, which were analyzed using mixed-effects models, and hospitalizations and ED visits, which were analyzed using recurrent event frailty models.
Results The study included 8502 insulin-treated CGM-naive adult patients with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [14.6] years; 4764 [56.0%] female; 3618 [42.6%] with Medicare and 2854 [33.6%] with Medicaid coverage). Of these, 2392 patients (28.1%) were prescribed CGM by primary care clinicians. Patients who initiated CGM were younger, more often English-speaking and commercially insured, and had higher baseline HbA1c levels and more microvascular complications. At 12 months, HbA1c levels decreased by 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57-0.75) percentage points (pp) in patients who initiated CGM vs 0.17 (95% CI, 0.08-0.27) pp in those who did not, with a between-group difference of −0.49 (95% CI −0.62 to −0.35) pp. CGM initiation was associated with lower risk of recurrent hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.98]) and ED visits (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]).
Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of adults with insulin-treated diabetes, initiation of CGM by primary care clinicians was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in HbA1c and significant reductions in recurrent hospitalizations and ED visits. These findings support expanding CGM implementation in primary care settings as a scalable strategy to improve diabetes outcomes and reduce acute care utilization, particularly in underserved populations.
Disclaimers
1. This activity is accredited by the American Medical Association.
2. This activity is free to AMA members.
ABMS Member Board Approvals by Type
ABMS Lifelong Learning CME Activity
Allergy and Immunology
Anesthesiology
Colon and Rectal Surgery
Family Medicine
Medical Genetics and Genomics
Nuclear Medicine
Ophthalmology
Pathology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery
Preventive Medicine
Psychiatry and Neurology
Radiology
Thoracic Surgery
Urology
Commercial Support?
NoNOTE: If a Member Board has not deemed this activity for MOC approval as an accredited CME activity, this activity may count toward an ABMS Member Board’s general CME requirement. Please refer directly to your Member Board’s MOC Part II Lifelong Learning and Self-Assessment Program Requirements.
Educational Objectives
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article.
Keywords
Diabetes and Endocrinology, Medical Devices and Equipment, Diabetes
Competencies
Medical Knowledge
CME Credit Type
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.21713