Activity ID
14431Expires
August 21, 2028Format Type
Journal-basedCME Credit
1Fee
$30CME Provider: JAMA Network Open
Description of CME Course
Importance The emergence of fentanyl in the setting of the US opioid crisis demands reconsideration of clinical approaches to buprenorphine initiation for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), with the rationale that fentanyl’s unique pharmacology leads to a greater risk of precipitated withdrawal (PW). Use of high-dose buprenorphine for initiation is a strategy that has been hypothesized to lead to less PW and better retention. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, it is important for clinicians to understand the evidence that suggests benefits of high-dose approaches while recognizing methodological limitations.
Observations This article summarizes observational studies that have been published as of 2025 addressing key questions relevant to a high-dose buprenorphine approach. First, how common is PW with the standard-dose initiation of buprenorphine for persons who use fentanyl? Is the risk greater than for persons who do not use fentanyl? Second, is high-dose buprenorphine initiation associated with lower risk of PW compared with standard dose? Finally, is initiation of high-dose buprenorphine associated with better long-term treatment outcomes (greater retention and less health care utilization) compared with standard dose?
Conclusions and Relevance Several recent studies provided a range of prevalence rates (1%-16%) for PW with buprenorphine initiation for persons with OUD using fentanyl, which may reflect differences in study design and setting. While certain studies described rates of PW that were 3 to 4 times higher among those with fentanyl use compared with those without, they were limited by low power due to the small number of PW events. Studies also did not provide clear evidence as to whether higher buprenorphine initiation is associated with lower risk of PW. Studies suggest higher retention and lower health care utilization with high dose vs the standard approach; however, there were methodologic problems due to observational study design, such as immortal time bias and unmeasured confounding. Evidence to inform clinicians’ decisions whether to initiate buprenorphine treatment with high-dose strategies among patients who use fentanyl was limited, and more definitive studies are needed.
Disclaimers
1. This activity is accredited by the American Medical Association.
2. This activity is free to AMA members.
ABMS Member Board Approvals by Type
ABMS Lifelong Learning CME Activity
Allergy and Immunology
Anesthesiology
Colon and Rectal Surgery
Family Medicine
Medical Genetics and Genomics
Nuclear Medicine
Ophthalmology
Pathology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery
Preventive Medicine
Psychiatry and Neurology
Radiology
Thoracic Surgery
Urology
Commercial Support?
NoNOTE: If a Member Board has not deemed this activity for MOC approval as an accredited CME activity, this activity may count toward an ABMS Member Board’s general CME requirement. Please refer directly to your Member Board’s MOC Part II Lifelong Learning and Self-Assessment Program Requirements.
Educational Objectives
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
Keywords
Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Opioids, Substance Use and Addiction Medicine
Competencies
Medical Knowledge
CME Credit Type
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28119