Activity

Activity ID

14573

Expires

December 26, 2028

Format Type

Journal-based

CME Credit

1

Fee

$30

CME Provider: JAMA Network Open

Description of CME Course

Importance  Patients with high-risk opioid use may require higher buprenorphine doses to maximize abstinence and retention in treatment.

Objective  To compare the efficacy and safety of 100-mg vs 300-mg once-monthly maintenance doses of extended-release buprenorphine among individuals with high-risk opioid use, including fentanyl.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted from October 26, 2021, to June 26, 2024, at 28 outpatient treatment centers in the US and Canada among treatment-seeking participants with moderate or severe opioid use disorder who injected opioids, used high doses of opioids, or used fentanyl.

Interventions  After completing buprenorphine induction and extended-release buprenorphine initiation (week 6), participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 8 additional 100-mg or 300-mg extended-release buprenorphine maintenance injections.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary end point was the proportion of responders for weekly opioid use, defined as participants whose percentage of visits with opioid abstinence was 80% or more over weeks 20 to 38. Post hoc analyses were performed to identify any subgroups that might benefit more from the 300-mg than 100-mg extended-release buprenorphine maintenance dose. Adverse events, including injection-site reactions, were reported. Analysis was conducted on an intent-to-treat basis.

Results  Of 436 participants randomized, 435 (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [10.9] years; 248 men [57.0%]) received injections and were analyzed (218 in the 100-mg arm and 217 in the 300-mg arm). There were 44 of 218 responders (20.2%) in the 100-mg arm and 50 of 216 responders (23.2%) in the 300-mg arm (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel difference, 2.6%; 95% CI, −4.7% to 9.9%). In post hoc analyses, the 300-mg maintenance dose performed significantly better than the 100-mg maintenance dose among participants who used fentanyl daily (difference, 11.1%; 95% CI, 0.4%-21.6%), used fentanyl 14 times or more per week (difference, 12.2%; 95% CI, 2.4%-22.1%), or both (difference, 15.4%; 95% CI, 4.6%-26.1%). With both dosing regimens, the frequency of opioid use decreased from more than 43 instances at screening to fewer than 3 instances by week 3 (through week 38). Extended-release buprenorphine–related adverse events were similar between groups, except for injection-site reactions, which were higher in the 300-mg arm (difference, 9.2%; 95% CI, 3.7%-15.2%). Both maintenance doses were well tolerated with no new safety signals.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this randomized clinical trial, both extended-release buprenorphine maintenance doses were well tolerated and effective among participants with high-risk opioid use. The 300-mg maintenance dose may perform better among individuals with heavy fentanyl use. These results are particularly relevant because individuals with opioid use disorder in North America are increasingly exposed to highly potent synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, a driver of high levels of opioid overdose deaths.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04995029

Disclaimers

1. This activity is accredited by the American Medical Association.
2. This activity is free to AMA members.

Register for this Activity

ABMS Member Board Approvals by Type
More Information
Commercial Support?
No

NOTE: If a Member Board has not deemed this activity for MOC approval as an accredited CME activity, this activity may count toward an ABMS Member Board’s general CME requirement. Please refer directly to your Member Board’s MOC Part II Lifelong Learning and Self-Assessment Program Requirements.

Educational Objectives

To identify the key insights or developments described in this article.

Keywords

Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Opioids, Substance Use and Addiction Medicine, Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Competencies

Medical Knowledge

CME Credit Type

AMA PRA Category 1 Credit

DOI

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.48043

View All Activities by this CME Provider

The information provided on this page is subject to change. Please refer to the CME Provider’s website to confirm the most current information.