Activity ID
15043Expires
May 28, 2029Format Type
Journal-basedCME Credit
1Fee
$30CME Provider: JAMA Oncology
Description of CME Course
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive biomarker with the potential to detect minimal residual disease (MRD), monitor treatment response, and identify recurrence (eg, molecular relapse) earlier than conventional clinical or imaging approaches. Although ctDNA-based MRD assays have demonstrated prognostic value in early breast cancer, their optimal clinical utility remains uncertain.
This review summarizes the current data on ctDNA MRD assays in early breast cancer. Although these assays have established analytical and clinical validity, their clinical utility remains uncertain. Dynamics of ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy are associated with pathologic complete response and long-term outcomes. Following completion of curative-intent therapy, ctDNA positivity (eg, presence of MRD) is strongly associated with future distant recurrence. Similarly, the emergence of ctDNA during surveillance precedes the clinical diagnosis of overt metastatic disease. Although observational studies and meta-analyses have supported ctDNA as a complementary biomarker for established risk-stratification tools, evidence that demonstrates improved outcomes with ctDNA-guided management remains limited. Furthermore, the optimal timing and frequency of testing remain unknown, and studies comparing assays are lacking. Multiple ongoing prospective interventional trials are evaluating whether ctDNA-guided treatment escalation or de-escalation can improve patient outcomes and support the routine implementation of ctDNA assays in clinical practice.
ctDNA-based MRD assays hold promise for refining risk stratification, enabling earlier detection of recurrence, and informing treatment decisions in patients with early breast cancer, but clinical utility has not yet been demonstrated. Prospective trials are essential to determine whether ctDNA-guided interventions improve outcomes beyond standard management. Clinicians should understand the strengths, limitations, and evolving evidence base of ctDNA assays, as well as patient preferences, prior to incorporating them into patient care.
Disclaimers
1. This activity is accredited by the American Medical Association.
2. This activity is free to AMA members.
ABMS Member Board Approvals by Type
ABMS Lifelong Learning CME Activity
Allergy and Immunology
Anesthesiology
Colon and Rectal Surgery
Family Medicine
Medical Genetics and Genomics
Nuclear Medicine
Ophthalmology
Pathology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery
Preventive Medicine
Psychiatry and Neurology
Radiology
Thoracic Surgery
Urology
Commercial Support?
NoNOTE: If a Member Board has not deemed this activity for MOC approval as an accredited CME activity, this activity may count toward an ABMS Member Board’s general CME requirement. Please refer directly to your Member Board’s MOC Part II Lifelong Learning and Self-Assessment Program Requirements.
Educational Objectives
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Cancer Biomarkers, Oncology, Women's Health
Competencies
Medical Knowledge
CME Credit Type
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.1465